Just released

http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/emba-ranking-2012

at first sight:
1) Asia to rise (UCLA/NUS, Tsinghua/Insead,Ceibs,Korea,ecc)
2) Spanish schools to lose some positions
3) Nice jump for Warwick which overcomes Imperial and is now the 3rd uk emba (lbs looks unreachable)
4) Cranfield to lose 20 positions
5) ESMT, new entry and overcomes Essec-Mannheim (too bad... it was my first choice)
6) IMM out of the ranking (?) but Tiasnimbas is now ranked again
7) Euromed and Lyon shows big progress (despite economic situation in French is not much better than in UK)
8) Hec Lousanne and Zurich are now in....

By the way, looking for example at UCLA/NUS (5)
salary: 255000
Salary growth:77
Careers: 57
Aims achieved: 41

IE Business School(12)
salary: 188000
Salary growth:138
career: 51
aims achieved:53

People experience a good salary growth, an high final salary BUT they look not so happy with their choice......

I personally more then happy to see my choice - Anrwerp Management School - jump from nowhere to 50th. Very unexpected. I was not hoped to see it's EMBA in FT ranking for another 3 years as the least. Career progress #2 and salary are amaising and hard to believe. Well above Vlerick, not bad at all. We'll see were it'll be next year. It'll start my study in two weeks and try to enjoy the feeling of good investment so far:). WU EMBA is one place below btw - my other option, which I did't choose (PMBA actually, but nevertheless:), even though I still believe WU is better.

Anyone knows if these programs are classed as Executive MBA? Any guess why they could not make into the list above?

The FT EMBA ranking is for part-time cohort programmes with over 20 graduates in each of the last few years. Many of those programmes fail one or more or those criteria. The others just won't be that good.