Hello, since I'm interested in pursuing a one-year MBA program, I've done my research, and my top two choices in the US for their one-year MBAs are Emory (Goizueta) and Southern Cal (Marshall). Personally, I would choose Emory, because it has a consulting concentration, and I want to enter the field of consulting in the future.
I also e-mailed Emory and asked them if one-year MBA students have access to the Career Services of the Two-year MBA students, and they said YES, which is good.
Please help me.. Thanks!
Emory vs. USC (one-year programs)
Posted Feb 04, 2008 08:26
I also e-mailed Emory and asked them if one-year MBA students have access to the Career Services of the Two-year MBA students, and they said YES, which is good.
Please help me.. Thanks!
Posted May 05, 2008 22:17
Go to USC. USC has arguably the most extensive alumni network in the world. Everywhere on earth you go, you will find a fellow USC alum. That = opportunities +$$$!
Marshall is highly respected and has a much better location for business than Emory which is in suburban Georgia. Inter-racial relations are not the best in Georgia (besides Atlanta), however in LA, you have the benefits of a global city. USC is the largest employer in Southern California, after the government. You have the best networking and study abroad opportunities around. Los Angeles is the American gateway to the Asia Pacific region, just as New York is to Europe. Atlanta is a growing city, but cannot compare to Los Angeles and does not come close in terms of job opportunities. Emory is a great school, but does not have the name recognition that USC does, which is very important. keep that in mind when making your decision. My USC degree has already helped my immensely... I remember visiting Emory and remarking that it (Atlanta) would be a great place to visit for a weekend - nothing more.
Marshall is highly respected and has a much better location for business than Emory which is in suburban Georgia. Inter-racial relations are not the best in Georgia (besides Atlanta), however in LA, you have the benefits of a global city. USC is the largest employer in Southern California, after the government. You have the best networking and study abroad opportunities around. Los Angeles is the American gateway to the Asia Pacific region, just as New York is to Europe. Atlanta is a growing city, but cannot compare to Los Angeles and does not come close in terms of job opportunities. Emory is a great school, but does not have the name recognition that USC does, which is very important. keep that in mind when making your decision. My USC degree has already helped my immensely... I remember visiting Emory and remarking that it (Atlanta) would be a great place to visit for a weekend - nothing more.
Posted May 06, 2008 11:49
Thanks for the advice, Kelly. Will take note of it. You're right, recognition is very important (in this case, USC), and there are A LOT of USC alumni.
By the way, you took your undergrad studies at USC, or your MBA?
Anyway, you can reply at my e-mail, if it's okay with you. It's [email protected]
Thanks again,
Raul
By the way, you took your undergrad studies at USC, or your MBA?
Anyway, you can reply at my e-mail, if it's okay with you. It's [email protected]
Thanks again,
Raul
Posted May 08, 2008 10:11
Thanks for the advice, Kelly. Will take note of it. You're right, recognition is very important (in this case, USC), and there are A LOT of USC alumni.
By the way, you took your undergrad studies at USC, or your MBA?
Anyway, you can reply at my e-mail, if it's okay with you. It's [email protected]
Thanks again,
Raul
Another point,
USC IBEAR MBA program caters to experienced candidates (mid-level professionals) (Av age - 33, avg experience - 11 years)...
By the way, you took your undergrad studies at USC, or your MBA?
Anyway, you can reply at my e-mail, if it's okay with you. It's [email protected]
Thanks again,
Raul</blockquote>
Another point,
USC IBEAR MBA program caters to experienced candidates (mid-level professionals) (Av age - 33, avg experience - 11 years)...
Posted May 14, 2008 00:26
USC isn't even the largest private employer in LA County let alone all of Southern Cal http://www.laalmanac.com/employment/em21e.htm.
And they have "a lot" of alumni? They don't enroll a particularly high number of students, I don't know what this is supposed to mean. SC alum are known for networking, but I think that has to do with necessity due to their lack of national prestige more than anything else. Having said all of that, even though it's not a top business school it's still a good option due to location.
And they have "a lot" of alumni? They don't enroll a particularly high number of students, I don't know what this is supposed to mean. SC alum are known for networking, but I think that has to do with necessity due to their lack of national prestige more than anything else. Having said all of that, even though it's not a top business school it's still a good option due to location.
Posted Sep 26, 2008 11:59
Well, I guess we know who didn't go to business school. ;)
1. County of Los Angeles = PUBLIC
2. Los Angeles Unified School District = PUBLIC
3. Federal Government Los Angeles = PUBLIC
4. University of California, Los Angeles = PUBLIC
5. City of Los Angeles = PUBLIC
6. State of California (non-education) Los Angeles = PUBLIC
7. Kaiser Permanente Pasadena = PRIVATE
8. Northrop Grumman Corp. Los Angeles = PUBLIC "NOC"
9. Boeing Co. = PUBLIC "BA"
10. Kroger Co. = PUBLIC "KR"
11. University of Southern California = PRIVATE
Which part of "private employer" don't you understand?
1. County of Los Angeles = PUBLIC
2. Los Angeles Unified School District = PUBLIC
3. Federal Government Los Angeles = PUBLIC
4. University of California, Los Angeles = PUBLIC
5. City of Los Angeles = PUBLIC
6. State of California (non-education) Los Angeles = PUBLIC
7. Kaiser Permanente Pasadena = PRIVATE
8. Northrop Grumman Corp. Los Angeles = PUBLIC "NOC"
9. Boeing Co. = PUBLIC "BA"
10. Kroger Co. = PUBLIC "KR"
11. University of Southern California = PRIVATE
Which part of "private employer" don't you understand?
Posted Sep 30, 2008 11:12
Hey - No need to get nasty! this is a loving forum here :-)
Andy.
Andy.
Posted Aug 05, 2010 13:47
Hey Kelly,
Well speaking about USC's 1 yr IBEAR MBA , does it fare well in getting the students recruited to Media companies..given the fct that its located in LA...?
When i saw the recruiters for IBEAR i could only find some bluechip and/or manufacturing companies but no walt disneys/warner bros/SKY/CNBC/CNN there in the list? any views on the suitability of USC 1 yr MBA for ppl like me who wannu get into Media and Entertainment industry?
Well speaking about USC's 1 yr IBEAR MBA , does it fare well in getting the students recruited to Media companies..given the fct that its located in LA...?
When i saw the recruiters for IBEAR i could only find some bluechip and/or manufacturing companies but no walt disneys/warner bros/SKY/CNBC/CNN there in the list? any views on the suitability of USC 1 yr MBA for ppl like me who wannu get into Media and Entertainment industry?
Posted May 05, 2011 10:29
Kellogg or Cornell
Related Business Schools
Other Related Content
LinkedIn Launches MBA Rankings of US Business Schools
News Jan 11, 2024
Shorter, Faster, Better? One-Year MBA Programs in the US
Article Apr 27, 2015
A growing number of US-based business schools are offering one-year MBAs. How do they stack up to their two-year counterparts?
Hot Discussions
-
Online MBA
Nov 12, 2024 3,226 26 -
Torn Between Ivey and RSM: What Would You Choose?
Oct 29, 2024 245 12 -
Question about some Masters- ESCP or EDHEC or Cranfield.
Oct 30, 2024 124 7 -
Looking to pivoting into management role in California
Nov 19 03:14 PM 72 5 -
Gut check
Nov 11, 2024 103 4 -
Are executive short courses that bad? Any alternatives if employer pays?
Nov 13, 2024 94 4 -
Time management when pursuing an MBA while working
Oct 31, 2024 76 4 -
eMBA or executive MSc Finance - Dilemma
Nov 12, 2024 69 3