Take a look at https://find-mba.com/board/gmat/why-you-should-take-the-gmat-33542
I don't know what your career goals are but I would certainly consider Cranfield to be on the same level as UEBS for the full-time MBA and MSc, and better for the EMBA and Exec Ed. Edinburgh often has a slightly older and more experienced cohort with lower salary expectations, which gets them into work slightly sooner than Cranfield, whose students are often holding out for roles in London or the Home Countries with higher salaries. Edinburgh students have a very different urban setting, reflected in higher overall satisfaction.
Since you mention employers: alumni networking, career services, career progress and international mobility are better for the Cranfield MBA.
If you wanted to work in HR, then I wonder if you are already CIPD qualified and whether a CIPD-accredited HR strategy course might be a better fit.
Overall, these are very different schools in terms of educational approach and cohort. UEBS is better for slightly older people going more in a straight line, while the Cranfield MBA is better for people looking to switch careers or directions. I'm unsure of the way both these schools have redesigned their courses to reduce the contact time. I would pick UEBS for the cohort and Cranfield for the experience.
[Edited by Duncan on May 12, 2024]
Take a look at https://find-mba.com/board/gmat/why-you-should-take-the-gmat-33542<br>
<br>
I don't know what your career goals are but I would certainly consider Cranfield to be on the same level as UEBS for the full-time MBA and MSc, and better for the EMBA and Exec Ed. Edinburgh often has a slightly older and more experienced cohort with lower salary expectations, which gets them into work slightly sooner than Cranfield, whose students are often holding out for roles in London or the Home Countries with higher salaries. Edinburgh students have a very different urban setting, reflected in higher overall satisfaction. <br>
<br>
Since you mention employers: alumni networking, career services, career progress and international mobility are better for the Cranfield MBA. <br>
<br>
If you wanted to work in HR, then I wonder if you are already CIPD qualified and whether a CIPD-accredited HR strategy course might be a better fit. <br>
<br>
Overall, these are very different schools in terms of educational approach and cohort. UEBS is better for slightly older people going more in a straight line, while the Cranfield MBA is better for people looking to switch careers or directions. I'm unsure of the way both these schools have redesigned their courses to reduce the contact time. I would pick UEBS for the cohort and Cranfield for the experience.