You get out what you put in. A selective, and costly school will tend to have better outcomes than a less selective, cheaper school. Actually, an MBA with low tuition can be very expensive when you add to that the wage premium lost through an inferior MBA.
I suspect that you might need to slow down and think carefully about your goals and paths to your goals. Even the idea of an MBA "in marketing" suggests to me that you have not researched the options too widely.
Is the MIT programme in Lisbon, the FGV or the FIA really inferior to the worst British MBA? I don't think so.
Focus on your goals. Identify the best programme to support them (why, for example, is it not an MSc in advanced marketing?) and take your time. Do not be rushed by a fake discount (offered to many students).
FGV is not even listed on the Financial Times ranking at the moment. Not only that but what they offer is an Executive MBA, which is not as in deep as a Full time MBA. Coppead is the only one listed and it's actually higher in the ranking than Hult but they require you to remain an entire working day taking classes, which is something most Brazilian companies do not tolerate, even if it is for the greater good of their employee. People here tend to say that Coppead is for rich kids only.
The financial aspect is a huge deal to me. Yes, Imperial College is a better option but it costs more, even with a scholarship. What if I absolutely cannot afford a 50.000 dollar program? Is it better to stay here and not do it at all then? And, outside of the British market, I'm not sure most companies can tell the difference between Imperial and Hult in terms of quality unless I'm being interviewed by someone who actually went to one of them.
I'm also considering the overall experience of doing an MBA abroad. If I do it in Portugal or Brazil I will not have an international experience because there will only be Brazilian and Portuguese students. In terms of forming a global networking of people and understanding how other markets work, I think an MBA on countries like the US or the UK is invaluable.
I'm also considering the future. Hult is improving in the global ranks. Maybe 5 years from now it will be more prestigious. Might not ever get to the level of an IE or LBS but might be in the Top 20, who knows?.
And the fact that I'm choosing an "Marketing MBA", as you said, its because I am not a Business graduate and I wonder if I actually need a regular Full MBA. On that note, FGV also offers a Marketing MBA (in Executive form). It's pretty common here.
You do make some valid points and I appreciate your input. Just trying to clarify my situation a little better.
<blockquote>You get out what you put in. A selective, and costly school will tend to have better outcomes than a less selective, cheaper school. Actually, an MBA with low tuition can be very expensive when you add to that the wage premium lost through an inferior MBA.
I suspect that you might need to slow down and think carefully about your goals and paths to your goals. Even the idea of an MBA "in marketing" suggests to me that you have not researched the options too widely.
Is the MIT programme in Lisbon, the FGV or the FIA really inferior to the worst British MBA? I don't think so.
Focus on your goals. Identify the best programme to support them (why, for example, is it not an MSc in advanced marketing?) and take your time. Do not be rushed by a fake discount (offered to many students). </blockquote>
FGV is not even listed on the Financial Times ranking at the moment. Not only that but what they offer is an Executive MBA, which is not as in deep as a Full time MBA. Coppead is the only one listed and it's actually higher in the ranking than Hult but they require you to remain an entire working day taking classes, which is something most Brazilian companies do not tolerate, even if it is for the greater good of their employee. People here tend to say that Coppead is for rich kids only.
The financial aspect is a huge deal to me. Yes, Imperial College is a better option but it costs more, even with a scholarship. What if I absolutely cannot afford a 50.000 dollar program? Is it better to stay here and not do it at all then? And, outside of the British market, I'm not sure most companies can tell the difference between Imperial and Hult in terms of quality unless I'm being interviewed by someone who actually went to one of them.
I'm also considering the overall experience of doing an MBA abroad. If I do it in Portugal or Brazil I will not have an international experience because there will only be Brazilian and Portuguese students. In terms of forming a global networking of people and understanding how other markets work, I think an MBA on countries like the US or the UK is invaluable.
I'm also considering the future. Hult is improving in the global ranks. Maybe 5 years from now it will be more prestigious. Might not ever get to the level of an IE or LBS but might be in the Top 20, who knows?.
And the fact that I'm choosing an "Marketing MBA", as you said, its because I am not a Business graduate and I wonder if I actually need a regular Full MBA. On that note, FGV also offers a Marketing MBA (in Executive form). It's pretty common here.
You do make some valid points and I appreciate your input. Just trying to clarify my situation a little better.