Hi all ;
I have a conditional offer from three colleges. Among these Glasgow and hull are double accredited. Just i wanted to know which one is better among these. I am not really bothered about money but as far is tution fees are considered Glasgow is quite expensive compared to hull. But keeping this condition in mind which one is better to opt for.

no doubt glasgow is the best among them. it has the reputation the history the quality and the jobs.

Hull is a dead place with old people and nothing going on. A lot of unemployed young racist thugs. Leicester is the worst place you can pick. Full of BNP members you may assualt you.

I wont go to Hull or Leicester unless i have a car and always go with a group of people.

Glasgow is one of the biggest and most lively cities in the UK if not Europe. A lot of things going on and the faculty is really good. The school of finance/economics have all the best professors. whereas in hull and leicester, you can only choose from a very limited range of courses.

Scotland is a nice place to live in as well. Hull and Leicester both are far away from London

I think Glasgow school is the better options for all the reasons doha has mentioned. Plus their business school is well recognised.
But also take in the fact that HULL is a lot cheaper,and spending millions of £ to rebrand their business school. So I also see it shooting up in rankings.
But for now. I'd go with Uni of Glasgow if I liked the course offered.

Thanks veymuch....