Which should I take? I have heard that the GMAT is harder for people without a lot of math skills. So I'm a bit wary of taking it, since I haven't done any kind of math since I was in school.
But it also seems like the GRE isn't as accepted as the GMAT at business schools. Is it going to be more widely accepted in the future? I'll probably be applying for b-school to start in 2014.
GMAT or GRE?
Posted Mar 28, 2013 17:18
But it also seems like the GRE isn't as accepted as the GMAT at business schools. Is it going to be more widely accepted in the future? I'll probably be applying for b-school to start in 2014.
Posted Mar 28, 2013 18:14
The GRE will never be as widely accepted as the GMAT. MBAs need to have strong quant skills and strong verbal reasoning. The GMAT is the best predictor of success in the MBA. If you want to take an MBA, the GMAT will allow you to get into more (and better) programs.
Posted Mar 29, 2013 11:27
This may be of interest:
http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/blogs/mba_admissions/archives/2009/05/no_gmat_no_prob.html
http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/blogs/mba_admissions/archives/2009/05/no_gmat_no_prob.html
Posted Mar 29, 2013 12:14
Nice article.
One commenter on that article, Malaking, isn't thinking very scientifically. He says that the GMAT isn't effective because he got a low GMAT but a high GPA in the graduate degree he is half way through at UT. The GMAT *is* the most effective predictor of success at the GMAT. That doesn't mean it's a perfect predictor, just that it's the best we have. That article is about the GRE, and if Malaking had a high GRE but a low GMAT, and if UT had a number of students like that, then that would be interesting.
As an MBA interviewer, I think that students who perfect the GRE typically prefer it because they have weak quant skills and see it as easier. It's not necessarily easier. But it's an indicator of students who might need to be carried by their classmates when it comes to quant skills. And that means that schools that are light on quant, or that struggle to recruits, are more likely to accept the GRE.
But that's not what's happening at Harvard. It's a very selective and well resourced school which is able to put a lot of effort into assessing the whole application package, including recommendations from Harvard alumni. And many Harvard applicants are younger, meaning that their undergraduate transcripts are more meaningful. That means that Harvard can rely less on the GMAT or GRE.
One commenter on that article, Malaking, isn't thinking very scientifically. He says that the GMAT isn't effective because he got a low GMAT but a high GPA in the graduate degree he is half way through at UT. The GMAT *is* the most effective predictor of success at the GMAT. That doesn't mean it's a perfect predictor, just that it's the best we have. That article is about the GRE, and if Malaking had a high GRE but a low GMAT, and if UT had a number of students like that, then that would be interesting.
As an MBA interviewer, I think that students who perfect the GRE typically prefer it because they have weak quant skills and see it as easier. It's not necessarily easier. But it's an indicator of students who might need to be carried by their classmates when it comes to quant skills. And that means that schools that are light on quant, or that struggle to recruits, are more likely to accept the GRE.
But that's not what's happening at Harvard. It's a very selective and well resourced school which is able to put a lot of effort into assessing the whole application package, including recommendations from Harvard alumni. And many Harvard applicants are younger, meaning that their undergraduate transcripts are more meaningful. That means that Harvard can rely less on the GMAT or GRE.
Posted Apr 02, 2013 16:23
If you want to take an MBA, the GMAT will allow you to get into more (and better) programs.
That makes sense. But all of the programs I'm applying to (Stanford, Harvard, Wharton, and Booth) all accept the GRE now.
At this point, I could go either way. But for these schools - would taking the GRE be considered a handicap if the GMAT is a better predictor of quant skills?
I haven't seen any stats on how many admitted students at these programs took the GRE instead of the GMAT. Anybody know of where I might find these?
That makes sense. But all of the programs I'm applying to (Stanford, Harvard, Wharton, and Booth) all accept the GRE now.
At this point, I could go either way. But for these schools - would taking the GRE be considered a handicap if the GMAT is a better predictor of quant skills?
I haven't seen any stats on how many admitted students at these programs took the GRE instead of the GMAT. Anybody know of where I might find these?
Posted Apr 02, 2013 18:28
Yes, I think that if a candidate presented with the GRE and had a resume that didn't suggest strong quant skills then that would be a flag for me. I'd certainly bring it up in the interview.
Related Business Schools
Other Related Content
LinkedIn Launches MBA Rankings of US Business Schools
News Jan 11, 2024
MBA Admissions Test Choice: GRE or GMAT?
Article Feb 16, 2016
More schools than ever are offering applicants a choice between taking the GRE and taking the GMAT. But many admissions directors say they still prefer the trusty old GMAT.
Hot Discussions
-
UPF-BSM vs EAE Business School vs UAB, seeking insights over potential business schools in Barcelona, Spain.
Nov 07, 2024 147 12 -
accreditation of french business schools
Oct 23, 2024 952 9 -
Question about some Masters- ESCP or EDHEC or Cranfield.
Oct 30, 2024 119 7 -
Are executive short courses that bad? Any alternatives if employer pays?
Nov 13 05:10 PM 77 4 -
Why do US schools like to hide their tuition fees?
Nov 09, 2024 90 4 -
OHM MBA in Germany
Nov 06, 2024 75 4 -
eMBA or executive MSc Finance - Dilemma
Nov 12 02:44 PM 57 3 -
MBA vs Masters in Marketing
Oct 18, 2024 301 2