QS Global 250 Business Schools Report


sts

Below is the link to the 2017 edition of the QS Global 250 Business Schools Report:

http://www.topmba.com/why-mba/publications/global-250-business-schools-report-2017

Below is the link to the 2017 edition of the QS Global 250 Business Schools Report:

http://www.topmba.com/why-mba/publications/global-250-business-schools-report-2017
quote
yipkc

Great update! Thanks for the link!

Not a surprise of the schools around the world that are classified as global elite, except that I would consider HKUST as one as well.

Great update! Thanks for the link!

Not a surprise of the schools around the world that are classified as global elite, except that I would consider HKUST as one as well.
quote
mba hipste...

I believe that their methodology needs to be a little more transparent. Their "employability" score is based on an employer survey - which is a good idea, but that 1,995 'responses' came from the latest survey. It doesn't say what employers they talked to, or whether a 'response' is a single employer or from a single person at one employer. They could have surveyed 1,995 HR people across a handful of companies, which would make this metric not so useful. Also, they exclude employers who employ fewer than 50 people, which means that many startups and entrepreneurial ventures would be excluded.

Also, their 'research excellence' metric is based an analysis of faculty citations, which is reasonable, but couples that with results from a survey of those who have 'expertise in the fields of business and management.' Who are these people and what affect do their responses have on the analysis?

To me it seems like they're adding ambiguity in order to skew the results without transparency.

I believe that their methodology needs to be a little more transparent. Their "employability" score is based on an employer survey - which is a good idea, but that 1,995 'responses' came from the latest survey. It doesn't say what employers they talked to, or whether a 'response' is a single employer or from a single person at one employer. They could have surveyed 1,995 HR people across a handful of companies, which would make this metric not so useful. Also, they exclude employers who employ fewer than 50 people, which means that many startups and entrepreneurial ventures would be excluded.

Also, their 'research excellence' metric is based an analysis of faculty citations, which is reasonable, but couples that with results from a survey of those who have 'expertise in the fields of business and management.' Who are these people and what affect do their responses have on the analysis?

To me it seems like they're adding ambiguity in order to skew the results without transparency.
quote

Reply to Post

Related Business Schools

Hong Kong, Hong Kong (PRC) 30 Followers 157 Discussions

Other Related Content

Nov 04, 2020

The Financial Times Updates Executive MBA Ranking for 2020

News Nov 04, 2020

MBA Rankings: What You Need to Know

Article Sep 06, 2016

How different rankings work and what they can tell you about business schools and MBA programs