The FT's new executive education rankings came out today. They have a combined ranking to show the winners in both the open and custom programme categories. You can download the top 50 at: http://on.ft.com/J53SJT
The top 25 are: Harvard; HEC; IMD; CL; IESE; FDC; Easde; Thunderbird; Insead; Essec; Pennsylvania; LBS; Northwestern; IE; Oxford; Cranfield; Western Ontario; Chicago; Virginia; MIT; Columbia; Ipade; Stanford; Bocconi and Ashridge.
It's an interesting ranking, and it's one way to see which schools have a extra form of leverage with employers. Schools that employers turn to for training their own people have a good chance of being the go-to schools for MBAs as well.
Of course there are many things are work in this ranking. Many of the schools are national leaders in countries where there is a strong commitment to developing leaders: CCL; FDC; ESSEC; LBS and so on. But, it suggests to me that schools that well do well in this ranking should have MBA programmes on the way up (especially, I am thinking of European school like Essec, HEC, Esade, Cranfield, Bocconi and Ashridge) when the recession eases. Some of the strong performers in the top 50 have launched or relaunched their MBA in the last several years (Essec, Ashridge, ESMT, Henley, Catolica) and those schools which are part of universities but don't have a full-time MBA (like ESCP, Helsinki and SSE) must be tempted to launch them, perhaps in joint ventures with schools in other regions.
New FT ranking out today
Posted May 14, 2012 22:47
The FT's new executive education rankings came out today. They have a combined ranking to show the winners in both the open and custom programme categories. You can download the top 50 at: http://on.ft.com/J53SJT
The top 25 are: Harvard; HEC; IMD; CL; IESE; FDC; Easde; Thunderbird; Insead; Essec; Pennsylvania; LBS; Northwestern; IE; Oxford; Cranfield; Western Ontario; Chicago; Virginia; MIT; Columbia; Ipade; Stanford; Bocconi and Ashridge.
It's an interesting ranking, and it's one way to see which schools have a extra form of leverage with employers. Schools that employers turn to for training their own people have a good chance of being the go-to schools for MBAs as well.
Of course there are many things are work in this ranking. Many of the schools are national leaders in countries where there is a strong commitment to developing leaders: CCL; FDC; ESSEC; LBS and so on. But, it suggests to me that schools that well do well in this ranking should have MBA programmes on the way up (especially, I am thinking of European school like Essec, HEC, Esade, Cranfield, Bocconi and Ashridge) when the recession eases. Some of the strong performers in the top 50 have launched or relaunched their MBA in the last several years (Essec, Ashridge, ESMT, Henley, Catolica) and those schools which are part of universities but don't have a full-time MBA (like ESCP, Helsinki and SSE) must be tempted to launch them, perhaps in joint ventures with schools in other regions.
The top 25 are: Harvard; HEC; IMD; CL; IESE; FDC; Easde; Thunderbird; Insead; Essec; Pennsylvania; LBS; Northwestern; IE; Oxford; Cranfield; Western Ontario; Chicago; Virginia; MIT; Columbia; Ipade; Stanford; Bocconi and Ashridge.
It's an interesting ranking, and it's one way to see which schools have a extra form of leverage with employers. Schools that employers turn to for training their own people have a good chance of being the go-to schools for MBAs as well.
Of course there are many things are work in this ranking. Many of the schools are national leaders in countries where there is a strong commitment to developing leaders: CCL; FDC; ESSEC; LBS and so on. But, it suggests to me that schools that well do well in this ranking should have MBA programmes on the way up (especially, I am thinking of European school like Essec, HEC, Esade, Cranfield, Bocconi and Ashridge) when the recession eases. Some of the strong performers in the top 50 have launched or relaunched their MBA in the last several years (Essec, Ashridge, ESMT, Henley, Catolica) and those schools which are part of universities but don't have a full-time MBA (like ESCP, Helsinki and SSE) must be tempted to launch them, perhaps in joint ventures with schools in other regions.
Posted May 15, 2012 12:06
Thanks, Duncan - your comments on this ranking are really interesting.
Schools that employers turn to for training their own people have a good chance of being the go-to schools for MBAs as well.
This is true, and something that MBA potentials should pay attention to. For example, some of IESE's top executive education clients include Nestlé, Abbott, Airbus, and Novartis. It's no coincidence that IESE also hosts recruiting events with these companies in attendance. Darden has similar relationships with companies like AES Corp, Bank of America, and Intel, among others.
Many of the schools are national leaders in countries where there is a strong commitment to developing leaders: CCL; FDC; ESSEC; LBS and so on.
And also I'd note that schools in developing countries (or those who have partnerships with schools in developing countries,) are starting to rise: Harvard's exec ed program has a solid foothold in China; there are two schools from Brazil now (FDC and Insper,) etc. I have a feeling there will be more next year as well.
...those schools which are part of universities but don't have a full-time MBA (like ESCP, Helsinki and SSE) must be tempted to launch them, perhaps in joint ventures with schools in other regions.
It's really strange that ESCP doesn't have a full-time program. I'm sure they could fill cohorts without even trying.
Thanks, Duncan - your comments on this ranking are really interesting.
<blockquote>Schools that employers turn to for training their own people have a good chance of being the go-to schools for MBAs as well.</blockquote>
This is true, and something that MBA potentials should pay attention to. For example, some of IESE's top executive education clients include Nestlé, Abbott, Airbus, and Novartis. It's no coincidence that IESE also hosts recruiting events with these companies in attendance. Darden has similar relationships with companies like AES Corp, Bank of America, and Intel, among others.
<blockquote>Many of the schools are national leaders in countries where there is a strong commitment to developing leaders: CCL; FDC; ESSEC; LBS and so on.</blockquote>
And also I'd note that schools in developing countries (or those who have partnerships with schools in developing countries,) are starting to rise: Harvard's exec ed program has a solid foothold in China; there are two schools from Brazil now (FDC and Insper,) etc. I have a feeling there will be more next year as well.
<blockquote>...those schools which are part of universities but don't have a full-time MBA (like ESCP, Helsinki and SSE) must be tempted to launch them, perhaps in joint ventures with schools in other regions.</blockquote>
It's really strange that ESCP doesn't have a full-time program. I'm sure they could fill cohorts without even trying.
<blockquote>Schools that employers turn to for training their own people have a good chance of being the go-to schools for MBAs as well.</blockquote>
This is true, and something that MBA potentials should pay attention to. For example, some of IESE's top executive education clients include Nestlé, Abbott, Airbus, and Novartis. It's no coincidence that IESE also hosts recruiting events with these companies in attendance. Darden has similar relationships with companies like AES Corp, Bank of America, and Intel, among others.
<blockquote>Many of the schools are national leaders in countries where there is a strong commitment to developing leaders: CCL; FDC; ESSEC; LBS and so on.</blockquote>
And also I'd note that schools in developing countries (or those who have partnerships with schools in developing countries,) are starting to rise: Harvard's exec ed program has a solid foothold in China; there are two schools from Brazil now (FDC and Insper,) etc. I have a feeling there will be more next year as well.
<blockquote>...those schools which are part of universities but don't have a full-time MBA (like ESCP, Helsinki and SSE) must be tempted to launch them, perhaps in joint ventures with schools in other regions.</blockquote>
It's really strange that ESCP doesn't have a full-time program. I'm sure they could fill cohorts without even trying.
Posted May 15, 2012 22:20
I think the challenge is to fit it into the labour markets they focus on. What ESCP has done very well, since closing the full-time EAP MBA, is cornered the market for post-MSc advanced masters. I wonder if they could wrap those up into an MBA in some way?
I think the challenge is to fit it into the labour markets they focus on. What ESCP has done very well, since closing the full-time EAP MBA, is cornered the market for post-MSc advanced masters. I wonder if they could wrap those up into an MBA in some way?
Posted May 16, 2012 14:18
I wonder if they could wrap those up into an MBA in some way?
I'm sure they could. The key would be to develop curriculum that fits in the niche between the MEB program and the EMBA, and includes an internship or hands-on project component. They certainly have the faculty to do it - and with their connections to employers through their executive education program, they'd have a recruitment base. I'd probably bump up the required experience for their EMBA program to 7 or 8 years to further distinguish that program from the standard MBA.
<blockquote>I wonder if they could wrap those up into an MBA in some way?</blockquote>
I'm sure they could. The key would be to develop curriculum that fits in the niche between the MEB program and the EMBA, and includes an internship or hands-on project component. They certainly have the faculty to do it - and with their connections to employers through their executive education program, they'd have a recruitment base. I'd probably bump up the required experience for their EMBA program to 7 or 8 years to further distinguish that program from the standard MBA.
I'm sure they could. The key would be to develop curriculum that fits in the niche between the MEB program and the EMBA, and includes an internship or hands-on project component. They certainly have the faculty to do it - and with their connections to employers through their executive education program, they'd have a recruitment base. I'd probably bump up the required experience for their EMBA program to 7 or 8 years to further distinguish that program from the standard MBA.
Related Business Schools
Stanford, California
96 Followers
170 Discussions
Full Profile
Oxford, United Kingdom
69 Followers
276 Discussions
London, Canada
38 Followers
77 Discussions
Full Profile
Berlin, Germany
158 Followers
173 Discussions
Glendale, Arizona
22 Followers
66 Discussions
Mexico City, Mexico
6 Followers
17 Discussions
Berlin, Germany
13 Followers
101 Discussions
Paris cedex 11, France
9 Followers
82 Discussions
Madrid, Spain
2 Followers
39 Discussions
Torino, Italy
6 Followers
42 Discussions
Fontainebleau, France
69 Followers
306 Discussions
Singapore
33 Followers
171 Discussions
Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
9 Followers
73 Discussions
Full Profile
Cergy-Pontoise, France
41 Followers
183 Discussions
Full Profile
Stockholm, Sweden
23 Followers
25 Discussions
London, United Kingdom
7 Followers
69 Discussions
Belo Horizonte, Brazil
1 Follower
2 Discussions
Madrid, Spain
6 Followers
134 Discussions
Barcelona, Spain
49 Followers
240 Discussions
Madrid, Spain
3 Followers
107 Discussions
Chicago, Illinois
42 Followers
149 Discussions
Evanston, Illinois
71 Followers
203 Discussions
New York City, New York
157 Followers
257 Discussions
Boston, Massachusetts
82 Followers
204 Discussions
Charlottesville, Virginia
27 Followers
62 Discussions
Barcelona, Spain
29 Followers
167 Discussions
Milan, Italy
70 Followers
211 Discussions
Lausanne, Switzerland
46 Followers
152 Discussions
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
66 Followers
170 Discussions
Cambridge, Massachusetts
52 Followers
175 Discussions
Madrid, Spain
113 Followers
364 Discussions
Reading, United Kingdom
21 Followers
205 Discussions
Full Profile
Jouy-en-Josas, France
98 Followers
386 Discussions
Bedford, United Kingdom
43 Followers
411 Discussions
London, United Kingdom
166 Followers
473 Discussions
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
5 Followers
53 Discussions
Other Related Content
Sep 11, 2023
The GMAC MBA Tour Lands in Africa Sept. 13-19
News Sep 11, 2023
Hot Discussions
-
Gies vs Heriot watt vs Liverpool vs Bradford for Online MBA
Oct 03 11:27 AM 177 11 -
MBA or not , guidance
12 hours ago 74 8 -
MS Finance rankings??
Sep 23, 2023 357 4 -
MBA in Japan - Is it a good choice?
Sep 10, 2023 139 4 -
Advice on programs in the US
Sep 24, 2023 87 4 -
Kelley-Manchester Global MBA ends
Sep 23, 2023 272 3 -
Blended - Hybrid MBA
Sep 06, 2023 87 3 -
Entrepreneurship MBA
Sep 11, 2023 100 3