Which one is the best in terms of placement and learning....
lancaster v/s cranfield v/s robert gordon
Posted Sep 05, 2013 17:50
Posted Sep 06, 2013 01:45
Doesn't the FT ranking answer that question?
Posted Sep 06, 2013 04:39
No, it doesn't. As some universities are having very course content and acrredited by required bodies but these uni are no where in FT list.
Posted Sep 06, 2013 11:02
Lancaster and Cranfield are in the FT ranking because they have better placement; Robert Gordon is not, because it does not. http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/global-mba-ranking-2013 All three are accredited by AMBA, so they will have similar core courses.
Related Business Schools
Other Related Content
Beyond London: MBA Programs in England
Article Jun 08, 2012
How MBA programs outside the capital can offer global, practical experience
Hot Discussions
-
ESCP EMIB (Executive Master in International Business)
Oct 18, 2024 2,559 48 -
Torn Between Ivey and RSM: What Would You Choose?
Oct 29, 2024 230 12 -
Best School for a JD/MBA Dual Degree?
Nov 03 05:24 PM 3,943 10 -
accreditation of french business schools
Oct 23, 2024 943 9 -
Question about some Masters- ESCP or EDHEC or Cranfield.
Oct 30 12:42 AM 93 7 -
Europe vs US - Opportunities/ROI
Nov 02 12:58 PM 61 4 -
UPF-BSM vs EAE Business School vs UAB, seeking insights over potential business schools in Barcelona, Spain.
4 hours ago 27 2 -
MBA vs Masters in Marketing
Oct 18, 2024 294 2