Which one is the best in terms of placement and learning....
lancaster v/s cranfield v/s robert gordon
Posted Sep 05, 2013 17:50
Posted Sep 06, 2013 01:45
Doesn't the FT ranking answer that question?
Posted Sep 06, 2013 04:39
No, it doesn't. As some universities are having very course content and acrredited by required bodies but these uni are no where in FT list.
Posted Sep 06, 2013 11:02
Lancaster and Cranfield are in the FT ranking because they have better placement; Robert Gordon is not, because it does not. http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/global-mba-ranking-2013 All three are accredited by AMBA, so they will have similar core courses.
Related Business Schools
Other Related Content
MBA Rankings: Finding the Best Business Schools
Article Jul 24, 2012
From the FT to Businessweek, we discuss the importance of rankings and how they work
Hot Discussions
-
Online MBA
Nov 12, 2024 3,226 26 -
UPF-BSM vs EAE Business School vs UAB, seeking insights over potential business schools in Barcelona, Spain.
Nov 07, 2024 166 12 -
Torn Between Ivey and RSM: What Would You Choose?
Oct 29, 2024 245 12 -
Best School for a JD/MBA Dual Degree?
Nov 03, 2024 3,970 10 -
Kozminski vs SGH
Oct 26, 2024 143 10 -
Gut check
Nov 11, 2024 103 4 -
Time management when pursuing an MBA while working
Oct 31, 2024 77 4 -
OHM MBA in Germany
Nov 06, 2024 76 4