Which one is the best in terms of placement and learning....
lancaster v/s cranfield v/s robert gordon
Posted Sep 05, 2013 17:50
Posted Sep 06, 2013 01:45
Doesn't the FT ranking answer that question?
Posted Sep 06, 2013 04:39
No, it doesn't. As some universities are having very course content and acrredited by required bodies but these uni are no where in FT list.
Posted Sep 06, 2013 11:02
Lancaster and Cranfield are in the FT ranking because they have better placement; Robert Gordon is not, because it does not. http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/global-mba-ranking-2013 All three are accredited by AMBA, so they will have similar core courses.
Related Business Schools
Other Related Content
MBA Rankings: Finding the Best Business Schools
Article Jul 24, 2012
From the FT to Businessweek, we discuss the importance of rankings and how they work
Hot Discussions
-
Choosing of Universities
Mar 19, 2024 257 5 -
Do MBAs carry more weight in the US than Europe?
Mar 21, 2024 163 4 -
Can’t decide between MBA from Lancaster, bath, Birmingham and edinburgh
Mar 23 05:39 PM 107 4 -
Healthcare and finance
Mar 27 07:40 PM 101 3 -
Banking to IB via MBA?
Mar 02, 2024 253 2 -
Deferred MBA advice
Mar 20, 2024 88 1 -
HHL MBA reputation
Mar 25 04:05 PM 56 1 -
Best affordable MBAs in the UK?
Mar 09, 2024 157 1