lancaster v/s cranfield v/s robert gordon


Which one is the best in terms of placement and learning....

Which one is the best in terms of placement and learning....
quote
Duncan

Doesn't the FT ranking answer that question?

Doesn't the FT ranking answer that question?
quote

No, it doesn't. As some universities are having very course content and acrredited by required bodies but these uni are no where in FT list.

No, it doesn't. As some universities are having very course content and acrredited by required bodies but these uni are no where in FT list.
quote
Duncan

Lancaster and Cranfield are in the FT ranking because they have better placement; Robert Gordon is not, because it does not. http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/global-mba-ranking-2013 All three are accredited by AMBA, so they will have similar core courses.

Lancaster and Cranfield are in the FT ranking because they have better placement; Robert Gordon is not, because it does not. http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/global-mba-ranking-2013 All three are accredited by AMBA, so they will have similar core courses.
quote

Reply to Post

Related Business Schools

Bedford, United Kingdom 44 Followers 414 Discussions
Lancaster, United Kingdom 26 Followers 335 Discussions

Other Related Content

MBA Rankings: Finding the Best Business Schools

Article Jul 24, 2012

From the FT to Businessweek, we discuss the importance of rankings and how they work

Hot Discussions