Really weird EMBA ranking: most of the FT's top 20 schools are missing from The Economist's top 70. So, no HEC (#1 in the FT ranking); Trium (3); EMBA-Global (4 & 6); LBS (8); Insead/Tsinghua (9); Antai (11), ESCP (14); MIT (15); Cambridge (18); Insead (19).
Why does this happen?
Economist: https://www.economist.com/whichmba/executive-mba-ranking-2020
FT: http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/executive-mba-ranking-2019
Economist ranking forgets most top 20 schools
Posted Jun 30, 2020 17:42
Why does this happen?
Economist: https://www.economist.com/whichmba/executive-mba-ranking-2020
FT: http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/executive-mba-ranking-2019
Posted Jul 02, 2020 16:06
Some of this might have to do with how the FT calculates salaries based on price purchasing parity. A lot of these programs (HEC, Trium, Insead / Tsinghau, Antai) recruit many students from places like China, who after the program report large salaries (comparatively).
I guess the Economist probably doesn't implement PPP in the exact same way.
Posted Jul 04, 2020 14:07
I understood from some business schools that they have have decided to leave the Economist ranking, because they didn't find they way of ranking fair. they prefer not being listed in the ranking than being badly ranked. if the Economist stays with this philosophy, all famous schools will leave the ranking.
[Edited by blibot on Jul 04, 2020]
Related Business Schools
Other Related Content
The GMAC MBA Tour Lands in Africa Sept. 13-19
News Sep 11, 2023
Hot Discussions
-
ESADE vs HHL vs IE MBA
Sep 06, 2023 262 11 -
Level 7 Apprenticeship
Sep 15, 2023 257 10 -
EMBA Programs
Sep 03, 2023 186 9 -
MS Finance rankings??
Sep 23, 2023 352 4 -
MBA in Japan - Is it a good choice?
Sep 10, 2023 133 4 -
Online MBA - ESMT/WHU etc..
Sep 24, 2023 144 4 -
Advice on programs in the US
Sep 24, 2023 84 4 -
MBA and Post-MBA at EADA
Sep 05, 2023 129 3