If you can read Dutch, or know a related language well enough to get the drift, is *is* worth reading through the dossier that Alexandra linked to. In a nutshell, DUO follows up a complaint that Nyenrode was not clear to applicants whether or not its MBA led to a NVAO-accredited masters degree. Nyenrode favoured phrases that might mislead someone, for example, saying that the course led to the "MBA title" to avoid saying it led to a master's degree. In Nyenrode's opinion, they had not misled anyone and were open with the DUO, for example, inviting them to come and visit the program. That is graceful because they were not seeking NVAO accreditation for their MBAs. The absence of this accreditation just won't matter for most applicants because often, it's only public sector jobs, especially in the developing world, that demand higher levels of state accreditation. Elsewhere, in Catholic Europe, it would be common to explicitly state when the degree is accredited by the university rather than by the state. In northern Europe, that just doesn't matter for most people, and -- for example -- in the Nordic countries, the only difference between 'academic' and 'vocational' degrees is the right to enter PhDs and whether or not there is VAT on the tuition (i.e., is it academic or vocational training). The Nyenrode MBA, for example, would certainly qualify someone for a Ph.D. at a school with the same accreditation - like AACSB or EQUIS - and I assume that WES would also validate the simple easily. However, maybe a bureacratic state university would reject it.
So, while it's hyperbolic to say that these degrees have no legal validity, it is worth making sure about the accrediation you might need.
If you can read Dutch, or know a related language well enough to get the drift, is *is* worth reading through the dossier that Alexandra linked to. In a nutshell, DUO follows up a complaint that Nyenrode was not clear to applicants whether or not its MBA led to a NVAO-accredited masters degree. Nyenrode favoured phrases that might mislead someone, for example, saying that the course led to the "MBA title" to avoid saying it led to a master's degree. In Nyenrode's opinion, they had not misled anyone and were open with the DUO, for example, inviting them to come and visit the program. That is graceful because they were not seeking NVAO accreditation for their MBAs. The absence of this accreditation just won't matter for most applicants because often, it's only public sector jobs, especially in the developing world, that demand higher levels of state accreditation. Elsewhere, in Catholic Europe, it would be common to explicitly state when the degree is accredited by the university rather than by the state. In northern Europe, that just doesn't matter for most people, and -- for example -- in the Nordic countries, the only difference between 'academic' and 'vocational' degrees is the right to enter PhDs and whether or not there is VAT on the tuition (i.e., is it academic or vocational training). The Nyenrode MBA, for example, would certainly qualify someone for a Ph.D. at a school with the same accreditation - like AACSB or EQUIS - and I assume that WES would also validate the simple easily. However, maybe a bureacratic state university would reject it.
So, while it's hyperbolic to say that these degrees have no legal validity, it is worth making sure about the accrediation you might need.