Strathclyde vs Lancaster vs Durham

greatans

52 33

Posted Apr 03, 2022 19:32

I dont know what you do but you have very little understanding of data and facts.

The teaching of these is dismal I know you suffer

It does not mean to make your lif and others more disguided though

Lancaster is a better MBA choice than Durham but the margin is not as glaring obvious.

You sound like a paid sponsor of Lancaster MBA. Lol. Bring facts and figures else No body is going to believe you and get convinced. Data and its explanation is there on the internet and it is for free. Its not a rocket science.
U seem to be a sufferer. Big time.

Come on dude you ar delusional with no MBA training whatsoever or you are Durham grad they are capable of graduating alumni of your caliber

The Durham Greek Dean plagiarized and was thrown out. The next couple of Deans were meriorce academic.

Lancaster has some really strong programs able to attract some strong academic stars.

Same senseless and baseless talk. You are Suffered Lancaster Grad may be.... Leave It. You are unable to understand simple data. Better you live in your dream world.... TC.

[quote][quote][quote][quote][quote][quote]Yes in terms of quickness it is quite evident from the FT100 2022 ranking that 77% of Lancaster students got placed compared to 53% for Durham.  But that's only first 3 months data and a very narrow perspective.  [/quote] Nothing you have said make a good case for Durham being a better choice and have done a lot of works to show Lancaster is probably not stronger than Durham Both schools are regional schools and Lancaster is a more established business school and MBA    Go Lancaster they also are more generous. [/quote] Its better if we stick to facts and make arguments that are based on solid evidence, and not on emotional contents as you are showing. "Generous" --> What for....... haha [/quote] I dont know what you do but you have very little understanding of data and facts. The teaching of these is dismal I know you suffer It does not mean to make your lif and others more disguided though Lancaster is a better MBA choice than Durham but the margin is not as glaring obvious. [/quote] You sound like a paid sponsor of Lancaster MBA. Lol. Bring facts and figures else No body is going to believe you and get convinced. Data and its explanation is there on the internet and it is for free. Its not a rocket science.   U seem to be a sufferer. Big time. [/quote] Come on dude you ar delusional with no MBA training whatsoever or you are Durham grad they are capable of graduating alumni of your caliber The Durham Greek Dean plagiarized and was thrown out. The next couple of Deans were meriorce academic. Lancaster has some really strong programs able to attract some strong academic stars. [/quote] Same senseless and baseless talk. You are Suffered Lancaster Grad may be.... Leave It. You are unable to understand simple data. Better you live in your dream world.... TC.

quote

donho199

422 503

Posted May 02, 2022 18:31

I think you can look no further than your dick and obviously not an mba caliber. Get a life dude, stop messing around at a place you clearly do not belong

[Edited by donho199 on May 02, 2022]

I think you can look no further than your dick and obviously not an mba caliber. Get a life dude, stop messing around at a place you clearly do not belong

quote

1 2

Posted Jul 16, 2022 21:13

Those are excellent points, other than the audit year. The data are collected every year, not only in the audit years. However, you need to factor in that this person's focus is not high salary but high confidence in finding employment.

Do Strathclyde/Lancaster graduates really get a post-MBA salary in the range of 89-99k per annum on average? That's what I find when I search about it in the internet. But when I talk to some of my friends ( Non-EU ) who are working in the UK, they tell me that it is not realistic. They are mostly from IT/ supply chain background. They say expect an annual salary below 50k. I am not sure if it's because they are unaware of MBA prospects or is that the ground reality for a Non-EU graduate trying to find a job there?

[quote]Those are excellent points, other than the audit year. The data are collected every year, not only in the audit years. However, you need to factor in that this person's focus is not high salary but high confidence in finding employment.  [/quote] <div>
</div><div>Do Strathclyde/Lancaster graduates really get a post-MBA salary in the range of 89-99k per annum on average? That's what I find when I search about it in the internet. But when I talk to some of my friends ( Non-EU ) who are working in the UK, they tell me that it is not realistic. They are mostly from IT/ supply chain background. They say expect an annual salary below 50k. I am not sure if it's because they are unaware of MBA prospects or is that the ground reality for a Non-EU graduate trying to find a job there?</div><div> </div>

quote

Duncan

14.007 15.473

Posted Jul 16, 2022 23:25

I think you know that:
- the data are independently audited
- they use PPP so salaries in the UK can differ from the global average
- a large number of graduates will work outside the UK
- non-European students might get lower offers
- the FT figures show total compensation after three years, not starting salaries. An MBA starting on a *base* of £50k/$70k can easily be on *total* compensation of £75k/$90k after three years.
- Strathclyde and Lancaster are hardly top-tier schools. These are inexpensive provincial cities. The City of Lancaster's average salary is £25k, compared to a UK average of £31k.
- If your primary goal is employment, don't take an MBA at an unranked school like Strathclyde. Study a subject with higher employment like accounting, computing, economics, engineering or finance, or take a masters at a better business school.

I think you know that: - the data are independently audited  - they use PPP so salaries in the UK can differ from the global average - a large number of graduates will work outside the UK - non-European students might get lower offers - the FT figures show total  compensation  after three years, not starting salaries. An MBA starting on a *base* of £50k/$70k can easily be on *total* compensation of £75k/$90k after three years.  - Strathclyde and Lancaster are hardly top-tier schools. These are inexpensive provincial cities. The City of Lancaster's average salary is £25k, compared to a UK average of £31k.  - If your primary goal is employment, don't take an MBA at an unranked school like Strathclyde.  Study a subject with higher employment like accounting, computing, economics, engineering or finance, or take a masters at a better business school.

quote

Duncan

14.007 15.473

Posted Jul 17, 2022 12:05

The extra time to take the GMAT and develop career strategy will be worth it. Find a career goal that leverages your experience. Get into a MBA or more specialised masters that supports your goal. A part time degree works if you do not want to move to the UK.

The extra time to take the GMAT and develop career strategy will be worth it. Find a career goal that leverages your experience. Get into a MBA  or more specialised masters that supports your goal. A part time degree works if you do not want to move to the UK. 

quote

1 2

Posted Jul 18, 2022 11:30

The extra time to take the GMAT and develop career strategy will be worth it. Find a career goal that leverages your experience. Get into a MBA or more specialised masters that supports your goal. A part time degree works if you do not want to move to the UK.

I see..Thanks Duncan. I will do some more reserach into this.

[quote]The extra time to take the GMAT and develop career strategy will be worth it. Find a career goal that leverages your experience. Get into a MBA  or more specialised masters that supports your goal. A part time degree works if you do not want to move to the UK.  [/quote] I see..Thanks Duncan. I will do some more reserach into this.

quote