Hi, I want to pursue an MBA in the near future, and as one of my top choices, I'm choosing between Imperial College (Tanaka Business School) of Cambridge (Judge Business School).
Which do you think is a better overall choice, including post-MBA job opportunities? Personally, I'll pick Imperial College...
Thanks!
Imperial vs. Cambridge
Posted Feb 04, 2008 08:00
Which do you think is a better overall choice, including post-MBA job opportunities? Personally, I'll pick Imperial College...
Thanks!
Posted Mar 28, 2008 16:36
Hi,
Yes I agree, I would pick Imperial as well. I have applied to both, but now I think because of the class size, the location, and the course content I will focus on Imperial.
I'm hoping I will be accepted to both schools, so I can pick between the two schools, my GMAT score is 680 and I have 5 years work experience in consulting in the USA,UK and Europe.
Yes I agree, I would pick Imperial as well. I have applied to both, but now I think because of the class size, the location, and the course content I will focus on Imperial.
I'm hoping I will be accepted to both schools, so I can pick between the two schools, my GMAT score is 680 and I have 5 years work experience in consulting in the USA,UK and Europe.
Posted Mar 29, 2008 12:02
Thanks a lot; I think Imperial is better too..
Posted Mar 29, 2008 21:49
Yep, definitely take Tanaka over Cambridge. It has a very good reputation. And Cambridge is a dead-end town. London swings.
Posted Mar 29, 2008 21:54
Woah! Correction. Just checked the 2007 rankings and Cambridge placed 7th, Imperial 58th. Maybe I was a little premature. London's still swinging, but you can always get there very easily on the train.
Posted Apr 14, 2008 22:52
Well, I think Cambridge has a higher reputation on a worldwide scale, is well known everywhere in the world. No one will say "I never heard of it". Tanaka's reputation is of course good too. But the FT table ranks Cambridge higher than Tanaka. Whatever you study at Cambridge, it is its reputation bringing you foreward. Even if the quality of the programme at Tanaka is better, I'd go for Cambridge.
Posted Apr 15, 2008 04:02
Well, I think Cambridge has a higher reputation on a worldwide scale, is well known everywhere in the world. No one will say "I never heard of it". Tanaka's reputation is of course good too. But the FT table ranks Cambridge higher than Tanaka. Whatever you study at Cambridge, it is its reputation bringing you foreward. Even if the quality of the programme at Tanaka is better, I'd go for Cambridge.
For consulting, Cambridge could be better...
For consulting, Cambridge could be better...
Related Business Schools
Hot Discussions
-
ESCP EMIB (Executive Master in International Business)
Oct 18 01:54 PM 2,471 48 -
Lawyer looking into MBAs. Good idea?
Oct 14, 2024 158 6 -
MBA vs Masters in Marketing
Oct 18 04:43 PM 280 2 -
Supply Chain - How reliable are concentration-specific MBA rankings?
Oct 07, 2024 144 2 -
Should I apply for an MBA or go straight for consulting?
Oct 08, 2024 112 2 -
MBA in Germany / Switzerland (safe, target choice)
Oct 17 10:33 PM 97 2 -
#accreditation
Oct 22 09:34 AM 66 2 -
The PPP Paradox: Why EMBA Rankings May Mislead Prospective Students
Oct 18 12:34 PM 46 1