Hello,
I was wondering if anyone had any advice or experience with this. I decided late in the game to start the MBA process.
UCLA would be my ideal choice, but at this point, I can only really make the 3rd round application deadline and I'd have to rush.
In this case, should I wait to apply next year in first round when more spots are available?
Thanks.
UCLA Anderson
Posted Dec 21, 2014 07:33
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone had any advice or experience with this. I decided late in the game to start the MBA process.
UCLA would be my ideal choice, but at this point, I can only really make the 3rd round application deadline and I'd have to rush.
In this case, should I wait to apply next year in first round when more spots are available?
Thanks.
I was wondering if anyone had any advice or experience with this. I decided late in the game to start the MBA process.
UCLA would be my ideal choice, but at this point, I can only really make the 3rd round application deadline and I'd have to rush.
In this case, should I wait to apply next year in first round when more spots are available?
Thanks.
Posted Dec 21, 2014 16:59
There's no harm in applying this year: they might waitlist you, and then give you an early offer for next year. What are your alternatives to the UCLA? Why not USC?
There's no harm in applying this year: they might waitlist you, and then give you an early offer for next year. What are your alternatives to the UCLA? Why not USC?
Posted Dec 21, 2014 21:35
Thanks for the response. USC would be good, but just from a logistical perspective, it would be hard for me. My job is on the west side of LA (i'm applying part time), and it would almost impossible to make out there on time for their class scheduel.
The job I have now is good in that it's one of the few that pays well enough while also affording me the time to get me my MBA so I can't just quit it.
[quote][/quote]
Thanks for the response. USC would be good, but just from a logistical perspective, it would be hard for me. My job is on the west side of LA (i'm applying part time), and it would almost impossible to make out there on time for their class scheduel.
The job I have now is good in that it's one of the few that pays well enough while also affording me the time to get me my MBA so I can't just quit it.
Thanks for the response. USC would be good, but just from a logistical perspective, it would be hard for me. My job is on the west side of LA (i'm applying part time), and it would almost impossible to make out there on time for their class scheduel.
The job I have now is good in that it's one of the few that pays well enough while also affording me the time to get me my MBA so I can't just quit it.
Posted Dec 21, 2014 22:29
I think you'll be fine with the part-time MBAs.
I think you'll be fine with the part-time MBAs.
Related Business Schools
Los Angeles, California
89 Followers
147 Discussions
Los Angeles, California
103 Followers
120 Discussions
Other Related Content
Jan 11, 2024
LinkedIn Launches MBA Rankings of US Business Schools
News Jan 11, 2024
A Place in the Sun: MBA Programs in California
Article May 08, 2010
Nice weather aside, California is still the place to go for those seeking the next big thing.
Hot Discussions
-
Cambridge Judge vs RSM
Apr 09, 2024 235 7 -
Do MBAs carry more weight in the US than Europe?
Mar 21, 2024 248 4 -
Healthcare and finance
Mar 27, 2024 178 3 -
Mannheim vs WHU
Apr 09, 2024 157 3 -
MBA at Imperial vs Bayes vs Warwick for international student
Mar 25, 2024 180 1 -
HHL MBA reputation
Mar 25, 2024 120 1 -
City or Manchester for MiF?
Apr 09, 2024 117 1 -
General MBA for experienced technologist
Apr 17 03:54 PM 72 1