I was hoping that someone would be able to shed some light as to my situation. I currently have started a company and am realizing that there is much more that I need to learn. Thus, I have decided to pursue a MBA in order to build off of what I have already learned by doing. I need flexibility so have narrowed my choices to Warwick and Manchester.
What would you consider to be more practical given that I live in the United States? Thanks in advance for the help!
MBA from UK school, started business in the U.S.
Posted May 20, 2009 01:27
What would you consider to be more practical given that I live in the United States? Thanks in advance for the help!
Posted May 20, 2009 19:00
If you're truly looking to go back to running your own company, maybe you don't have to worry about the UK-US reputation gap as much. Go for what you think is a better school, perhaps one with the better entrepreneurship focus. Both are considered great b-schools, though - at least in the UK.
Posted May 30, 2009 15:04
hi, which one has more reputation with companies and recruiters.
MBS 2 yr Global MBA
or
WBS 3 yr Executive MBA
thanks
MBS 2 yr Global MBA
or
WBS 3 yr Executive MBA
thanks
Related Business Schools
Other Related Content
Warwick Launches New Hybrid Accelerator MBA For March 2024 Intake
News Dec 01, 2023
Beyond London: MBA Programs in England
Article Jun 08, 2012
How MBA programs outside the capital can offer global, practical experience
Hot Discussions
-
ESCP EMIB (Executive Master in International Business)
Oct 18, 2024 2,633 48 -
UPF-BSM vs EAE Business School vs UAB, seeking insights over potential business schools in Barcelona, Spain.
Nov 07, 2024 146 12 -
Torn Between Ivey and RSM: What Would You Choose?
Oct 29, 2024 239 12 -
Best School for a JD/MBA Dual Degree?
Nov 03, 2024 3,961 10 -
Kozminski vs SGH
Oct 26, 2024 136 10 -
Gut check
Nov 11 05:12 PM 91 4 -
Why do US schools like to hide their tuition fees?
Nov 09, 2024 86 4 -
OHM MBA in Germany
Nov 06, 2024 74 4