I was hoping that someone would be able to shed some light as to my situation. I currently have started a company and am realizing that there is much more that I need to learn. Thus, I have decided to pursue a MBA in order to build off of what I have already learned by doing. I need flexibility so have narrowed my choices to Warwick and Manchester.
What would you consider to be more practical given that I live in the United States? Thanks in advance for the help!
MBA from UK school, started business in the U.S.
Posted May 20, 2009 01:27
What would you consider to be more practical given that I live in the United States? Thanks in advance for the help!
Posted May 20, 2009 19:00
If you're truly looking to go back to running your own company, maybe you don't have to worry about the UK-US reputation gap as much. Go for what you think is a better school, perhaps one with the better entrepreneurship focus. Both are considered great b-schools, though - at least in the UK.
Posted May 30, 2009 15:04
hi, which one has more reputation with companies and recruiters.
MBS 2 yr Global MBA
or
WBS 3 yr Executive MBA
thanks
MBS 2 yr Global MBA
or
WBS 3 yr Executive MBA
thanks
Related Business Schools
Other Related Content
Warwick Launches New Hybrid Accelerator MBA For March 2024 Intake
News Dec 01, 2023
Beyond London: MBA Programs in England
Article Jun 08, 2012
How MBA programs outside the capital can offer global, practical experience
Hot Discussions
-
MBA Strathclyde vs Aston vs NTU
Mar 18, 2024 435 11 -
Healthcare and finance
Mar 27 07:40 PM 104 3 -
Banking to IB via MBA?
Mar 02, 2024 253 2 -
Deferred MBA advice
Mar 20, 2024 93 1 -
MBA at Imperial vs Bayes vs Warwick for international student
Mar 25 04:06 PM 88 1 -
Any guesses as to why several schools are reporting big increases in applications?
14 hours ago 39 1 -
Best affordable MBAs in the UK?
Mar 09, 2024 159 1 -
Saint Gallen vs Mannheim MBA
Mar 22 03:20 PM 33 0