Dear All,
Which of the above programs better in terms of post degree employment opportunities, salaries and placement?
Thanks in advance
Warwick Executive MBA vs. Global MBA Manchester
Posted Jan 22, 2020 14:46
Which of the above programs better in terms of post degree employment opportunities, salaries and placement?
Thanks in advance
Posted Jan 23, 2020 17:42
The Warwick program probably recruits a (slightly) older, more experienced cohort, so that will affect salaries.
Both are generally aimed at those in established career paths who don't want to make substantial leaps in their career.
The Warwick program, according to the most recent EMBA ranking from the FT, is ranked pretty well for careers and shows a decent salary increase. No comparable stats are available for the Manchester program, but I'd imagine salaries are a bit lower given the relative experience level of the cohorts.
Both are generally aimed at those in established career paths who don't want to make substantial leaps in their career.
The Warwick program, according to the most recent EMBA ranking from the FT, is ranked pretty well for careers and shows a decent salary increase. No comparable stats are available for the Manchester program, but I'd imagine salaries are a bit lower given the relative experience level of the cohorts.
Posted Jan 23, 2020 20:53
Thank you for your input.
There is one thing that make me more confused but I don’t know if it is relevant or not, The Warwick university ranking 77 worldwide is lower than Manchester 55 based on times higher education ranking. However, I have reviewed many FT rankings (European business school and Global MBA) which show that MBA in Warwick is a bit better than Manchester MBA.
There is one thing that make me more confused but I don’t know if it is relevant or not, The Warwick university ranking 77 worldwide is lower than Manchester 55 based on times higher education ranking. However, I have reviewed many FT rankings (European business school and Global MBA) which show that MBA in Warwick is a bit better than Manchester MBA.
Posted Jan 23, 2020 23:46
I think it's important to focus on your goals and needs. The Manchester programme is more like a full time MBA, because it has a strong, extensive set of core courses and a lots of project work. The Warwick EMBA is much more compressed and is aimed more a senior managers.
Posted Jan 28, 2020 18:36
However, I have reviewed many FT rankings (European business school and Global MBA) which show that MBA in Warwick is a bit better than Manchester MBA.
The European Business School ranking isn't gauged on a particular program but the combined strength of all of a school's ranked programs.
The European Business School ranking isn't gauged on a particular program but the combined strength of all of a school's ranked programs.
Posted Jan 28, 2020 18:57
I think the other person is trying to work around the fact that the MBS Global MBA is not in a ranking because it lacks the cohort structure needed by the FT rankings.
Related Business Schools
Other Related Content
Warwick Launches New Hybrid Accelerator MBA For March 2024 Intake
News Dec 01, 2023
Hot Discussions
-
MBA Strathclyde vs Aston vs NTU
Apr 17, 2024 607 13 -
Dilemma over IE business school EMBA
Apr 05, 2024 283 12 -
How to evaluate IIFT's Executive PGDM
Apr 03, 2024 147 5 -
Healthcare and finance
Mar 27, 2024 192 3 -
Any guesses as to why several schools are reporting big increases in applications?
Mar 30, 2024 230 3 -
Take GMAT again?
Apr 23 02:15 AM 87 3 -
City or Manchester for MiF?
Apr 09, 2024 142 1 -
General MBA for experienced technologist
Apr 17, 2024 113 1