So I am considering an EMBA from these three places. LBS is by far the best of the lot. However their costs are high and the next intake is only in Sep. So I am now looking at the other two. I am a co-founder of a small company in the telecom & technology space. I am keen to know which of these two will offer me the best environment for: Course curriculum relevant to an innovations & technology led entrepreneurial environment, superior alumni network and global recognition & prestige attached to the school. A lot of our company's work is in Asia and Africa where we sell our solutions, so having a name that is recognizable is considered an advantage in those places. So nett nett my question is: Which of these two will give an edge from a Global perspective not just UK/Europe point of view.
CASS vs Imperial vs LBS
Posted Dec 22, 2011 08:51
Posted Dec 23, 2011 00:16
LBS starts in both January and September. I think you need to return to do more research.
Posted Dec 23, 2011 03:19
I am aware of the Jan intake for LBS. But given that I have not yet taken the GMAT and their sessions starts mid Jan, I thought it would be next to impossible to consider an admission possibility on such short notice. I spoke to them late Nov and they said that they would freeze the class latest by mid Dec.
Posted Dec 23, 2011 07:54
LBS is qualitatively better: the difference in fees is nothing compared to the outcomes. Cass is a great programme but he school is small and doesn't have a great network in Asia or Africa. Imperial has a great brand in the Commonwealh countries because of its undergraduate engineering expertise but the EMBA is pretty lightweight. If you really object to LBS then Chicago, WHU-Kellog and Insead are the only other global programmes in Europe.
Posted Dec 23, 2011 07:56
Thanks Duncan. That helps a lot. I'll chew on that and do some more research before I head back to clarify any further doubts I may have. Appreciate your time.
Posted Dec 23, 2011 09:14
Go for Russell Group unis
Posted Dec 23, 2011 13:22
Muzri: seriously? So he should rule out Chicago, LBS, Cass and Insead in order to attend an MBA programme with lower quality students who graduate onto lower salaries? And why exactly should we do that?
Posted Dec 25, 2011 05:33
So Duncan- Got an admission offer from Cass. Waiting on Imperial. Won't make the Jan start for LBS given that it starts only a few weeks from now. Should I take up Cass or wait and try my luck with LBS for their Sep intake? What would your advice be? Merry Christmas btw :)
Posted Dec 25, 2011 07:25
I would try for Chicago and LBS. Cass is great but not so global. It will still accept you if Lbs says no.
Related Business Schools
Other Related Content
London Business School Announces New 1-Year MBA
News Feb 07, 2024
MBA School Choice: INSEAD vs. LBS
Article Jun 18, 2018
London Business School and INSEAD are two of the world’s top business schools, with strong placements in consulting and technology firms. But each has its own pros and cons for potential MBA applicants.
Hot Discussions
-
UPF-BSM vs EAE Business School vs UAB, seeking insights over potential business schools in Barcelona, Spain.
Nov 07, 2024 147 12 -
Torn Between Ivey and RSM: What Would You Choose?
Oct 29, 2024 240 12 -
"Late Bloomer" with average academics/experience, but 720 GMAT and Polyglot
Nov 07, 2024 96 4 -
Are executive short courses that bad? Any alternatives if employer pays?
Nov 13 05:10 PM 77 4 -
Why do US schools like to hide their tuition fees?
Nov 09, 2024 90 4 -
Time management when pursuing an MBA while working
Oct 31, 2024 73 4 -
OHM MBA in Germany
Nov 06, 2024 75 4 -
eMBA or executive MSc Finance - Dilemma
Nov 12 02:44 PM 57 3