Hi,
I am a IT professional and migrating to Australia(Sydney) next year. Can anybody guide me how is EMBA in AGSM.
Ammiy
EMBA in AGSM
Posted Oct 26, 2008 18:34
I am a IT professional and migrating to Australia(Sydney) next year. Can anybody guide me how is EMBA in AGSM.
Ammiy
Posted Oct 27, 2008 14:22
Well according to the website(http://www2.agsm.edu.au/agsm/web.nsf/Content/News-MediaReleases-AGSMFTRankings07), they are ranked in the FT rankings No. one in Australia, and 44 worldwide, so i guess you can say its pretty good.
Andy
Andy
Posted Oct 29, 2008 15:31
Interestingly, AGSM doesn't appear in the Economist's Top 100, although Melbourne Business School and Curtin both do (at 26 and 94). The nos.1 and 39 rankings given on AGSM's website are taken from a study conducted by the Australian School of Business, NSW, which one can only assume reflects some kind of methodological difference.
Posted Oct 29, 2008 15:52
AGSM is not in 2008 FT's rankings, whereas it was in 2007 ramkings. So does it specify that quality of education has dropped.
Posted Oct 29, 2008 16:18
I don't know what it means, but it certainly is suspicious - as i understand, rankings are calculated over years,and not only for one year at a time - so what can make a school disappear from them?
maybe you can try and mail FT for the answer.
maybe you can try and mail FT for the answer.
Posted Oct 30, 2008 11:36
The thing that always confuses me about the Economist's rankings is the statement at the bottom of the page, under the section entitled Unranked Schools, which reads: "The following schools were not included in the 2008 rankings. The inability to include them in the rankings does not reflect any shortcoming of the programme."
Posted Oct 31, 2008 12:48
Never seen that one before..... It kind of undermines the hole rating system, isn't it?
i guess they just do it to avoid being dragged in to court by the schools not in the list.
i guess they just do it to avoid being dragged in to court by the schools not in the list.
Posted Oct 31, 2008 13:48
Yeah, its a pretty ambiguous statement, though I don't know that it completely undermines the ranking system; it just adds another tier - those relatively big name schools that can't even make it into the top 100. Having said that, I do find it hard to believe that some of the b-schools in the 'not-quite-good-enough' list really aren't good enough. Maybe it reflects the fact that some of them haven't been established for long enough yet, didn't fill in some piece of paperwork properly, or for some reason didn't meet the assessment criteria in the way the others did. I really don't know. Ultimately, I suppose, it just tells once again what we already knew: rankings aren't perfect. Far from it, when there seems to be so much variation depending on which one you look at. I believe there was an article on here about this very subject a little while ago.
Related Business Schools
Hot Discussions
-
MBA Strathclyde vs Aston vs NTU
Apr 17 07:50 PM 532 13 -
Oxford executive diplomas
Apr 01, 2024 245 9 -
Any guesses as to why several schools are reporting big increases in applications?
Mar 30, 2024 214 3 -
Mannheim vs WHU
Apr 09, 2024 155 3 -
Deferred MBA advice
Mar 20, 2024 125 1 -
MBA at Imperial vs Bayes vs Warwick for international student
Mar 25, 2024 180 1 -
Two MBAs for the price of one
Apr 12 03:20 PM 133 1 -
General MBA for experienced technologist
Apr 17 03:54 PM 71 1