Hi ! I’ve been recently admitted to 2 emba. One given by HEC (but not the trium) and the London Business school one.
It’s difficult to decide which one to do.
LBS seems to be more international than HEC (I've read some comments in others discussions) like its cohort is.
My objectives are to gain in international exposure and in starting a sector change after many (too many?) years in the same one by moving up into HQ board.
It’s difficult to rely only on alumni’s feed back as they are always claiming their choice is the best !
Does anybody can give me an objective feed back ?
Thanks a lot !
EMBA at LBS or HEC
Posted Sep 25, 2018 01:31
Hi ! I’ve been recently admitted to 2 emba. One given by HEC (but not the trium) and the London Business school one.
It’s difficult to decide which one to do.
LBS seems to be more international than HEC (I've read some comments in others discussions) like its cohort is.
My objectives are to gain in international exposure and in starting a sector change after many (too many?) years in the same one by moving up into HQ board.
It’s difficult to rely only on alumni’s feed back as they are always claiming their choice is the best !
Does anybody can give me an objective feed back ?
Thanks a lot !
It’s difficult to decide which one to do.
LBS seems to be more international than HEC (I've read some comments in others discussions) like its cohort is.
My objectives are to gain in international exposure and in starting a sector change after many (too many?) years in the same one by moving up into HQ board.
It’s difficult to rely only on alumni’s feed back as they are always claiming their choice is the best !
Does anybody can give me an objective feed back ?
Thanks a lot !
Posted Sep 25, 2018 02:34
Someone else was asking about the HEC EMBA, so try to search. It's a more local offer for a more entrepreneurial, less corporate, more junior cohort. LBS will be better for most people, which is why it gets ranked by the FT.
Someone else was asking about the HEC EMBA, so try to search. It's a more local offer for a more entrepreneurial, less corporate, more junior cohort. LBS will be better for most people, which is why it gets ranked by the FT.
Posted Sep 25, 2018 09:13
Hi Duncan. Many thanks for your reply. But are we talking about EMBA hec ? The cohort has in average around 38y and 15y expérience which seems a bit higher than lbs.
Are you aware about any big gaps concerning quality of courses / teachers, about any recruiters’ preference? What would be your advice for a sector change?
Thanks
Are you aware about any big gaps concerning quality of courses / teachers, about any recruiters’ preference? What would be your advice for a sector change?
Thanks
Hi Duncan. Many thanks for your reply. But are we talking about EMBA hec ? The cohort has in average around 38y and 15y expérience which seems a bit higher than lbs.
Are you aware about any big gaps concerning quality of courses / teachers, about any recruiters’ preference? What would be your advice for a sector change?
Thanks
Are you aware about any big gaps concerning quality of courses / teachers, about any recruiters’ preference? What would be your advice for a sector change?
Thanks
Posted Sep 25, 2018 16:55
Sorry, by junior I don't mean younger. I mean less advanced in their career. It's nicely discussed on the thread I mentioned.
There are different recruiters with different preferences. The ranked programmes are the ones with the best outcomes for most students. For a sector change, find people who have moved into that sector and see the route they have taken. To change industry it may be better to take a very similar role but just In that different industry.
There are different recruiters with different preferences. The ranked programmes are the ones with the best outcomes for most students. For a sector change, find people who have moved into that sector and see the route they have taken. To change industry it may be better to take a very similar role but just In that different industry.
Sorry, by junior I don't mean younger. I mean less advanced in their career. It's nicely discussed on the thread I mentioned.
There are different recruiters with different preferences. The ranked programmes are the ones with the best outcomes for most students. For a sector change, find people who have moved into that sector and see the route they have taken. To change industry it may be better to take a very similar role but just In that different industry.
There are different recruiters with different preferences. The ranked programmes are the ones with the best outcomes for most students. For a sector change, find people who have moved into that sector and see the route they have taken. To change industry it may be better to take a very similar role but just In that different industry.
Posted Sep 27, 2018 20:06
I agree that LBS is probably the best bet for most students. However, it would be good to know what sector you are interested in transitioning into, because this might change the calculus somewhat.
I agree that LBS is probably the best bet for most students. However, it would be good to know what sector you are interested in transitioning into, because this might change the calculus somewhat.
Related Business Schools
London, United Kingdom
135 Followers
420 Discussions
Full Profile
Jouy-en-Josas, France
83 Followers
341 Discussions
Hot Discussions
-
ask for consultant
Dec 14, 2019 616 32 -
Low cost / budget MBA in Canada
Nov 22, 2019 3,154 26 -
Judge vs INSEAD
Nov 26, 2019 3,882 24 -
How good is Skema for a Master in Finance?
Dec 09, 2019 239 20 -
EMIB for Scientific PhD graduate?
Dec 12, 2019 196 19 -
Australia MBA Ranking?
Nov 28, 2019 1,497 15 -
Manchester Global MBA vs IE online MBA vs full time MBA
Nov 26, 2019 384 13 -
MBA in Singapore
Nov 21, 2019 1,005 11