MBA Discussion Board
MBA Discussion Board > United Kingdom - Ireland > Strathclyde vs. Imperial 
Strathclyde vs. Imperial
| Author | Message |
j.pardoubek  
Joined: 05 Jan 2009 Posts: 22 |
Strathclyde vs. Imperial
Dear All,Mon Feb 23, 2009 07:27 PM Any comments on the subject? I'm planning Distance Learning. Thanx! |
 Profile
 P.M.
|
 Quote
|
| kshamandi
Joined: 05 Feb 2009 Posts: 13 |
Strathclyde vs. Imperial
Actually no comment as I dont recommend the distance learning at all as u will pay too much money without getting real interaction of the class dynamics.I only recommend the distance learning option for those ppl who has a high management position with over 10 years working experience, have to travel alot as its his job nature and has have a commitment with his family.
Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:46 AM |
|
Profile
P.M.
|
Quote
|
| nblueblaze Joined: 04 Dec 2008 Posts: 187 |
Strathclyde vs. Imperial
Both of them are equally good...Both Strath n Tanaka are top class B schools...as far as reputation is considered, Imperial is more renowned...but then it doesnt matter really matter since you want to do a distance learning course...it matters only in the case of FT MBA/MScs...
Sun Mar 01, 2009 07:24 AM --- [Edited by nblueblaze on 01 Mar 2009] |
|
Profile
P.M.
|
Quote
|
| congeee
Joined: 27 Mar 2009 Posts: 6 |
Strathclyde vs. Imperial
hey j.p.Sat Mar 28, 2009 02:45 AM i was reading your other thread about "manchester vs warwick" and here i found you asking about "strathclyde vs imperial" i agree with nes that imperial has a better ranking and reputation than strathclyde. i am in the same shoe as you... researching distance learning/online MBA but i wouldn't consider imperial or strathclyde at all. i will stick to either manchester or warwick which are both better than the first 2. read my posting on your "manchester vs warwick" thread. cheers [Edited by congeee on 28 Mar 2009] |
|
Profile
P.M.
|
Quote
|
Reply to this post